Running Head : Portraiture and p machinationy-spirited AdvantagePortraiture and enthusiast AdvantagePortraiture and Partisan AdvantagePortraiture is the art of dashing portraits and this art has never been as cancel as when the artist is to capture the image of a semipolitical figure . The artist has the essential critical lying-in of devising that figure seem like a real charitable being as well as the crucial parturiency of capturing a larger than life figure . Two of the cleanse examples of encompassing these qualities argon the famous oil on crest portraits of Marie Antoinette with Her Children by Marie-Louise-Elisabeth Vigee-Lebrun and Louis XIV by Hyacinthe RigaudThe scene of to each unrivaled of these paintings is kinglike . In Marie Antoinette the setting is cryptic yet downcast hues to show a mysteri ous ele manpowert . Lebron doesn t choose to use soil to create this tone , but uses the deep colors of burgundy honey oil and browns . The only quantify that white or light tones be used is close to the face which gives a celestial nose place Silk and velvet materials which be associated royalty . The expensive Oriental rug and pillow is important to the element of royaltyLouis the XIV also has racy fabrics of fur , and velvet , yet the colors ar a good deal lighter . His royalty is established in his stance plot of land Marie Antoinette is sitting with her children giving a realistic effect Louis the XV shows reality in his somatic features . The eye is non displace to his features automatically . However , his features are not that flatteringThe clothes of each are what are conside rubicund in today s society as feminine . The fashion in the18th century was different for men . It was perfectly delicious for them to wear frilly clothes specially tho se of the upper classes because they did not! do physical labor . The stockings and red high heeled clothe worn by the last bang-up king of France sooner the revolution indicate his status .
Marie Antoinette and her children are all milled in velvet and lace which over again indicates the lack of physical labor . Even though the garments are royal in nature , the average person would predict them to be dressed as they areLouis the XIV and Marie Antoinette were some(prenominal) leading of France . One was boffo the other was not , but they both exuded lavishness of a monarchy that would ultimately lead to the downfall of their authorities The lavish ness was accept for Louis the XIV , but not by his heirs The very points in the portrait that brought praise and honor to him brought despise for Marie Antoinette . Over time , both of these portraits have been able to bring the viewer to some other time before the French alteration when the extravagant lives of the royalty was a reality and not a mythReferencesHistory of fine art : a Brief Survey . Retrieved June 23 , 2007 fromHYPERLINK hypertext transfer communications protocol /www .ou .edu /class /ahi1113 /slides /13-10 .jpg http /www .ou .edu /class /ahi1113 /slides /13-10 .jpgHistory of Art : a Brief Survey . Retrieved June 23 , 207 from...If you want to bring out a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment