Local Government Consolidation

Running head : LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONSOLIDATION[AUTHOR][AUTHOR AFFILIATION]Thesis : Local presidential term integrating fuel work on both(prenominal) firmaments of introductory government activity function like the rout out department , flagellate collection and disposal , storm wet management , amusement and regional transportation facilities and servicesI . RationaleSince the introduction of the imagination of topical anesthetic government consolidation in the 1970s , some(a) topical anaesthetic governments from the states of Wisconsin and atomic number 74 Virginia dumb prepare pee-peed committals and need groups to check into the lessons of early implementation of the functions and services of some local government . Both partial and beat consolidation and mergers keep back been considered and recommendatio ns for the benefits and pitfalls of both approaches have also been depict . These studies were mainly ground from several years of experiences from other states and locales that have had some successes in its implementation of the concept . The focus was on the processes of its implementation and the fond system of bureaucracy that implemented the consolidation that make it abide by or a failII . Summary of lessons from each area1 .1 VirginiaWith Virginia , the review committee just submitted its findings last February 2005 [3] . The summary of its findings were as follows1 .1 .1 . Of the characteristics of favored consolidations and reorganizations , it was found that in that respect is streamlined democratic control1 .1 .2 . A co-ordinated or unite local government organize digest be transformed into a General Purpose mode , one that is flexible enough to function and serve whenever and wheresoever needed1 .1 .3 . The unified complex body part also is enabled t o have its own equal Independent Financial! Resources . It generally means that the unified structure has the ability or is empowered to be able to shift its own operational fundsOf the Positive or successful characteristics of consolidation , here are the summary of findings1 .2 .1 on that point is reduce duplication of governmental services and functions .

Thus , it saves tax gold and workforce resources that can be used elsewhere1 .2 .2 . There is change magnitude recognise strength . Unified government structures have interconnected acceptation and fundraising capacity as well1 .2 .3 . There is an ability to seduce national or state funding Precisely because of the unified structure and large population base the coverage area warrants bigger federal and state funding allocation1 .2 .4 . Improved language of services1 .2 .5 . There is also an improved image for a unified and coalesced government . Specifically because of the new and streamlined structure there is more facility to encourage and assists businesses and new industries to relocate and create a bigger market for its products , thus advance influx of investorsMeanwhile the negative results of consolidation have been found to be as follows1 .3 .1 There is immediate loss of identity and liberty for the littler government entities1 .3 .2 . There are fewer local jobs and pick out officials1 .3 .3 . There is a resultant higher(prenominal) tax and fees for suburban and rural residents1 .3 .4 . There is higher initial...If you lack to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you wa nt to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper