Kant`s Moral Theory

Immanuel Kant was a ren induceed German Philosopher in the 1700 s . He was well-nigh far-famed for his Enlightened thoughts . In his writing , Kant addressed his imagination of honorable philosophy . Kant believed that judging actions by their consequences is not an weft for virtuous theory because our consequences are not in our nurse . Kant believed that we impart to the full control over our motives but not full control over the consequences of actions . He also believed that we should not be valued based on the experiences we produceKant addressed the intellect of honorable worth as dealing with the act of practiced spirit or motive . He called this good go one-time(prenominal) In Kant s words to act out of duty is to do what is right or what one believes to be right It past comes cover version to one s intenti ons of right or falsely in their actionsKant uses hypothetical overbearing and insipid arrogant to push accentuate what we should or ought to do . He uses these controllings to describe how our goals and motives reconcile what we should or ought to do . Moral obligation is unconditional or savourless . Kant s first form or law regarding categorical imperative is that we consider doing something that we disregard will or can presume that all individuals in the universe will doKant equated the head of devising false omens to his first form of categorical imperative by describing the situation as if it were world-wide law . If one do forecast to borrow silver and then consecrate it fanny knowing in advance that their intention was not to net it back it would be a lie . As commonplace law says , everyone from then on made a promise would be lying and this would be a self-destructing act .

No one would ever believe promises , as they would be sense as falseKant s second form seeks to describe what constitutes proper preaching of a person or person s . In evolution the example of borrowing money while making a false promise . Would the person who you are borrowing the money know that they will not receive their money ? If no than according to Kant you are using this person as operator rather than as an end where you both share the equivalent goalsReferring to the New Drug case a Kantanian would first reverberate what is lack me to determine what is my motive and intention for taking the process . Second using the law of categorical imperative a Kantanian would say all runners in the race should take the d o drugs so that all runner performances can be as set upd . And do I think that the other runners and officials would denial it if they knew I have used a drug to bring up my performance . My answer is no . They would probably look germinate down on it , even though it is not on the banned list . And they may even re-evaluate the listA situation in my own life that I would apply the categorical imperative is with the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper