'Most Writers of Fiction Do Not Earn Enough Money to Live from Their Writing Essay\r'

'Here are nigh conditions under which a novelist could reasonably expect most government suport. In general terms, if the sparer has already proved that he or she can write well, and if the stories produced are stimulating and interesting, whence I witness that some pecuniary help might be given. Language tone is difficult to define, but if the paternity shows, for example, good grammar, a wide vocabulary, and elegance and imagination, then I can see a well-grounded reason for assisting an author to spend some conviction free from capital problems.\r\nSuch a piece of music needs to be encouraged. the entertainment value of a book would be also a doer in deciding whether to provide assistance to an author. pass on consideration would include social and educational set expressed in the author’s work. However, if the ideas were socially irresponsible, or if the stories contain unnecessary violence or pornography for its own sake, then I would non want to see the a uthor sponsored to write stories which do not benefit society.\r\nOther exceptions are the numerous writers of good books who do not require financial help. Books which proved to be extremely popular, such as the Harry Potter stories, clearly need no subsidy at all because the authors have get down rich through their writing. Views on what good quality writing means will vary widely, and so if any author is to be given money for writing, then the decision would have to be do by a committee or plank of judge. An individual opinion would certainly cause discord among the reading public.\r\n'