An Unpredicted New kind Of Warfare Essay Example for Free

An Unpredicted New kind Of Warfare EssayWorld fight one continued for four years across a vast and stretching from the English business line to the northern Swiss border. In 1914 the prediction was that the warfare would be over by Christmas. At the root system of the war, The Germans thought they could capture France before invading Russia therefore preventing a war on two fronts. nonwithstanding because of the failure of tactics they couldnt succeed, and this was one of the main reasons the war lasted for such a long period. It was no monthlong each side trying to capture the separate in the war but stopping the enemies move workforcets in trench warfare and using new technology to soften up enemy, if it didnt back fire.Defense was at one time the key to winning the war and was far superior than the offensive. The trenches were hard to capture by locomote army because of increasing fire post from machine wedges. Crossing no-mans land was committing suicide for the t roops as machine guns could inflict frightful damage on advancing infantry.The realization of the advantage of defense resulted in the enhanced rate of advancing technology. This was one of the core reasons for stalemate upon the westbound Front because technology was advancing at such a rapid rate and new inventions were being introduced in a hasty manner. Many of the new inventions were not sufficiently tested and many of the ideas were not thoroughly thought through which resulted in unnecessary delays. Aircraft at the start of the war was use primarily for reconnaissance work, spotting enemy trenches and movements before a practicable effort. precisely this alerted the enemys attention and gave them time to prepare resulting in the attackers job being more costly and problematic to undertake. Barbed appearfit was massed produced on an industrial scale by twain sides as barbed outfit entanglements were unbreakable for troops, stopped cavalry in their tracks, and slowed troops down completely.Attempts were made to destroy barbed wire with shellfire but the barbed wire is just lifted and often destroys up in a big mess than before. atomic number 17 petrol was first introduced in April 1915 by the German army against the French army. Chlorine gas destroyed your respiratory organs and you had a long slow death. But poisonous gas was an extremely unreliable method of attack as the direction of the wind may change at any time and return the poison in the direction of the attacker killing your own troops. Also, as with many other weapons that were developed it can only be used once to an advantage, as their broker of surprise is lost. Gas masks were quickly distributed to both sides and gas was not such a great solicitude as it was first thoughtTanks were invented to be the technical solution to the major problem of both barbed wire and machine guns. They had an armour plate to protect troops whilst attacking and caterpillar traction to chuck up t he sponge them to cross-hilly and muddy ground. But the first Mark I tank was a weak and variable weapon. It was used at the Somme in 1916 but neither their performance nor numbers could help win the action. It was not until Cambrai in 1917 that tanks were used on a large scale. They crunched their way over the barbed wire and German trenches creating a huge hole in the German defenses.A General on horseback commanded his armies in battle up until 1914. After 1914 telephones were working. Battles could be safely won from far away behind a desk. But though this development in communications may seem a great success, but telephones in reality were useless in attack, because the commanders didnt turn over a good perspective of the war and didnt know everything as they would be if they were sitting on horse and overlooking the battle which led to troops often drag back because of lack of communications and broad view of the battle.In 1914 neither the French nor the British armies wer e accomplished for trench warfare. They had to adapt which to a faultk them several years and accounted for several of their failures and delays. French generals felt infantry charges were a necessary to win the war despite the huge advances in technology. And Germen generals thought that with enough ammunition and man power and gradually wearing down the enemy they would win the war.Eventually in 1917 the French army refused to attack any more, only to defend because of the horrific numbers of casualties lost for only a few miles gained. A term to explain this was the cannon fodder. The battle of Somme in 1916 is a good example for a imposing case of awful miscalculations by the leading of both sides Britain lost around 419,000 men for only a strip of land about 25 km long and 6km wide. These huge loses were due to bad planning. The men were untrained and advanced towards the enemy walking and carrying heavy packs on their backs. These big pushes which was a belief overlap b y British Kitchener and Haig were mere execution of sides troops as they were walking straight into machine gun fire.The first World War was the first war between two vastly industrialized economies and factories on both sides mass-produced inconceivable amounts of artillery and ammunition. Industry was under an incredible amount of strain and it was not until 1917 that the munitions industry was able to produce adequate quantities of ammunitions. Railways played a major part in the pane of troops form one area of the western front to the next along with food and other supplies. Both sides were also both able to keep going because of the huge numbers of men and supplies always brought by trains and trucks. Basically both the central powers and allies were never in a drought of resources.At the outbreak of war on the Western Front, the Allies and the Germans were relatively equal in their strengths and weaknesses. Bad leadership held up many of the British and French attacks result ing in unnecessary numbers of casualties. Germany spread its men out over many of the fronts not only in the eastern front, but also in the Western Front. One argument is that if perhaps they had concentrated on only one front they may have had a chance of success as opposed to spreading out the troops over a large area.The deadlock ended in 1918 when it was broken by eventual collapse of the central powers. It was in the long run attrition that proved the crucial decider but it was a series of events and inventions that had not happened before which gave way to the end result. The submarine campaign was important as it brought America into the war with fresh troops and much require resources and resulted in a huge blow to the German morale.In conclusion, there was no one avowedly reason for deadlock on the western front, but that it was due to several problems. Technology advanced too rapidly, generals were not adequately trained for trench warfare. As one quote would say The gr eat war was fought with 20th century weapons and 19th century tactics. The war was able to be kept going due to the fact they were both vastly industrialized economies and neither side was able to eliminate the other since and the governments of both sides directed the industries towards mass production of uniforms, ammunitions, ships, explosives etc