Ethics of Gene Therapy Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Ethics of Gene Therapy - look Study ExampleThe term clone encompasses three different procedures guide oning to different results. These atomic number 18 conceptus cloning (artificial twinning), adult DNA cloning (reproductive cloning) and therapeutic cloning (bio medical cloning). Of these three, therapeutic cloning seems to limit the maximum potential to breed piece (read human cloning). gentle cloning is most aptly set forth as breeding humans for the purpose of harnessing wanders and variety meat from their bodies. Therapeutic cloning begins with the insertion on a human DNA into an ovum. A pre embryo is formed by giving electric shocks to the resultant ovum. The root word cells from the developed pre embryo are then extracted and subsequently provided an suitable environment where they develop into the required tissue or pipe organ. These experiments are yet to micturate any significant results. Once accomplished, the aim of developing organs or tissues which perfect ly match with the recipient will be realized eliminating the fatal risk of rejection because the organ will be based on the recipients genetic material. Human cloning is also expected to chance on new breakthroughs in rejuvenation, heart attack reversals, diabetics, leukemia, genetic disorders and even cancer. Despite the broad spectrum of benefits that human cloning offers, according to a poll, 63% believed that human cloning is against Gods will and 90% considered it to be a bighearted idea (Times, 2001). A Morgan poll conducted during November 2001 found that 70 portion of Australians aged 14 and over O.K. of extracting stem cells from human embryos to treat disease and injury. Seventy percent also believed that couples with excess embryos after asepsis treatment should be able to donate them to research rather than discard them. However, when it came to using a patients have genetic material to create a cloned embryo to be used as a reservoir of stem cells (i.e. therapeut ic cloning), just over half (55 percent) of the respondents approved, with 32 percent disapproving and 13 percent undecided (Morgan Poll, 2001).Animal cloning application as a regular process should be prevented and breeding of humans should also be strongly opposed to maintain the natural uniqueness of each individual (Church of Scotland, 1997). These objections are not absolutely without any reasons. They do have apt explanations and sufficient grounds. Human cloning would produce a gamut of clones with reduced mental abilities and enhanced physical strengths which would make then highly susceptible to exploitation. Producing agent babies with enhanced skills would also lead to an excess of skilled persons thus decreasing the importance of talent and skill. Human cloning may also lead to emotional difficulties in the clone humans life. A child born(p) from his fathers DNA would in effect be a twin of his own father. This can also lead to a high degree of conundrum. There is no g uarantee that human clones would be normal and they readiness even be suffering with life long disabilities. Any minor flaws while incorporating certain characteristics could as well create fictional monsters. Tampering with nature to an