CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF A NURSING QUANTITATIVE STUDY Research Paper

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF A NURSING QUANTITATIVE STUDY - investigate Paper ExampleIn the case of NSCLC patients, receipt of radiotherapy or chemotherapy at the time of oppugn and significant airflow obstruction was considered to be exclusion criteria (Gore et al., 2000). The participants were identified from the outpatient records and the selective informationbase of the radiotherapy department. The benefits identified by the authors are non direct in nature as far the participants of the psychoanalyse are concerned. However, the sample universe of discourse of the study is the representative sample of the larger population of COPD patients and NSCLC patients (Gore et al., 2000). The results of the study expect to identify the gaps in the nurse and social care that the sample population receives. Thus the indirect and longer term benefit intercommunicate by the study is that it would come up research findings which would further aid as background selective information for advance d research in the area. The authors have clearly mentioned that the study was approved by the Hull and east Riding Research ethics committee. Thus it can be assumed that risks of participation addressed by the study. It has been mentioned in the article that the authors obtained written informed consent from all participants. The subjects were identified from the outpatient records and the database of the radiotherapy department. COPD patients were identified from the outpatient records of patients attend for follow up at Hull chest clinic. In the NSCLC group about one trine were attending Hull chest clinic and the rest were identified from the database of the department of radiotherapy (Gore et al., 2000). Thus the participation does not appear to be of complete voluntary nature. However as the study has followed the ethical practices as dress by Hull and East Riding Research ethics committee and as it has been mentioned that written consents were cool from the patients, possib ility of forceful or uniformed inclusion is minimal. It should also be noted here that the study and its design were approved by Hull and East Riding Research ethics committee. The major autarkic variables were COPD and NSCLC. The dependent variables include parameters to measure quality of medical care and quality of social and community life. These parameters included General Health Vitality Mental Pain Role Emotional Role Physical complaisant functioning and Physical functioning. The dependent parameters on quality of social and community life included accession to Counselor Community Social Worker Hospital Social Worker Palliative Services RSN soil Nurse and Home Help (Gore et al., 2000). The methodology used to collect data included semi- structured interviews, refreshen of documentation and measurement against standardized quality of life tools. The study followed a multi-method design which includes both qualitative and quantitative approaches(Gore et al., 2000). The int erdisciplinary nature of the study extending from health sciences to social sciences justifies the design. The authors claim to be of the first of its descriptor to have used such a methodology. . The time period of for data collection of the study has not been specifically mentioned. Patients were interviewed in their own homes by a single interviewer (JG). At the time of interview patients performed spirometric tests The data derived from the interview were coded and, with the QoL data and was