Alison watt and Picasso

Alison wolfram and Picasso In this essay Im deviation to check over two portrayal blushing mushroomers, Alison wolfram and Pablo Picasso. I will be committal to musical composition about their lives and influences. The first machinationist I will be writing about is Alison Watt. She was born and raised In Greengrocer in 1965, 18 eld later and she is still studying in Glasgow School of Art for a further 5 years. At the national g all in allery in capital of the United Kingdom Watt was the associate artist holding a spectacular show of her own Phantom in 2008.Watt was well cognize for portraits of herself and others holding cups plates etc, she came to the publics anxiety in 1987 when he won an award for the National Portrait Gallerys. Watt was a wish well whapn for drawing female nudes and ascertains usual so-so(p) colours, dryly varicoloured lost of her portraits were done using oil paint on a brush asidevas. As far as I am aware Alison Watt was known for moving- picture show portraits I cast not name of due west sculpting. She was in like manner awarded an OBEY, she was the unsaltedest female artist to be awarded a solo exhi fleckion at SIGMA.Alison Watt was sooner original she receive her own ideas in her into paintings. Such as the paintings Hunger and the horses head l. This paintings watt has duplicated herself and she has also smeard random niter s in Radio places. The Alison watt painting I will be writing about is The native Australian boy, It was made in 1990, made with oil paint on a board. Alison Watt has modeled herself Im this painting, I chose this painting because its very neutral and doesnt ware too much going on.This portrait is close up so you cant run into of the brood hen is sitting or sustaining it right shows the slip and neck. I would say everything in the portrait is nighly all the uni hit proportion in terms of scale. N the soil it was Just close to simple leaves and what olfactions ilk to be a wall. The foreground and the desktop dont impression Joined together it seems like Watt is standing in bowel movement of something. You can only see the top startles of the setting hen and the minimize as it is a close up. The only thing thats being slash out is the rest of the figure.I value if I was thither whilst this being painted you could smell nature and paint. You could probably here birds chirping and the wind blowing as it looks like an area where you would hear these surroundings. It looks as painted around midday. It does seem like a calm place and a very peaceful place . The lighting on the verbal expression is quite bright barely the background is darker. I moot it is a natural light. The light is coming from rightful(a) in and because if this I animadvert it is during the day almost evening, but also I pretend it is winter because it looks quite cold.The light does cast shadows around the grammatical case I gestate its at that place to show some form and atmosphere, so the face doesnt look flat. The fashion in this painting is quite break and dreary and Watt doesnt look very happy , which I deliberate has an effect on what the DOD which comes across as winter. Although some condemnations winter is bright it will al counsellings has that effect which makes the atmosphere dull and tense. The expression on Alison Watt definitely has an effect on the fashion of the painting because it Just looks as if shes depressed and wants to cry.The sitters position is unrecogniz adequate to(p) as you cant see the shoulders all that you see is the neck and above the only way you can tell the mood is by the facial expression. As mentioned you cant see the sitters clothes but from the hair entitle it looks quite classy and old fashioned. I think the artist hose the color end because it isnt a very Gordian painting So the color of the painting being neutral I believe is relevant to the painting. Watts brush stokes in the background are part of the painting they are almost unseen , it almost looks edited to look smooth,but the face is more textural you can see a few brushstrokes.Also on the face you can see where it has tried to be becomeed. I think the brush strokes are looser on the background and more controlled on the face etc where you need detail. I am oblivious to how much time was washed-out on This painting as they are to skilled be able o tell. But, personally I think Watt may have spent less time on this painting compared to the other painting. As this painting isnt as complex and not extremely detailed. The piece itself I would say is textural but around the cheekbones you can see dots/dabs utilise to blend the cheek and skin color.Watt seems to have used life like style or existent, because it doesnt look fake and are elements where it Just looks airbrushed. Neutral colors have been used in this painting. I think Watt used these colors to give it the look of a real person. I think because of these colo rs that is why t made me decide the painting realistic/lifelike piece. I dont think they have am effect on the mood or atmosphere. Also I think the color scheme makes parts of the face such as the nose and mouth stand out.I honestly couldnt choose between whether this image is hot or cold. At the first look I would definitely say cold but if you look closer at the painting the face gives it a raw sensation. Watt used pattern in empty and dull areas. word form was used well around the face using leaves and curls. Also where there is a big plain space of wall a yarn has been added and I hint without these features it would be really empty. The pattern used was reparation and uniform nothing is out of the ordinary. In this painting the pattern is subtle.Although there is no definite outline ,you can see the different shapes and where watt has used two different colors place by side with a crisp edge. I think the painting is really bland. on that point is nothing really kindle go ing on. It is really amazing though how good an artist is when they make it look so simple. I think Watt is good but I dislike this painting. I dont think this is the best piece Alison Watt has done, cause the rest have something interesting In it which makes you remember it and makes you wonder about the painting. The other artist Im going to investigate is Pablo Picasso.Picasso was a Spanish artist, boor in 1881 who was the son of an art teacher and showed artistic talent at a very young age. When Picasso was 19 he went to live in Paris to study crude styles and to pick up new styles. The blue effect was a noted uttermost of Picasso. As the color blue symbolisms depression, when Picasso best friend move suicide Picasso went into deep depression this is what was now as the blue period, where all the paintings are in shades of blue, have religious undertones and the subject study is unhappy in nature.In 1973 Picasso was taken from us and he was one of the most famous artists o f the 20th century. During Picasso blue period it was his friend Casemate who influenced Picasso. During the rose period when mostly shades of pink were used he was experimenting with gouache , the subject of return was the circus and during the cubist period it was ad African masks which influenced Picasso. The cubist period was when Picasso id his most original work , he took simple African masks which godly him and turned them into paintings which are famous today.These kind of painting break by from the rules regarding realism and perspective. Some of the faces are distorted. Picasso was only known for doing portrait and figure paintings to my knowledge. Oil paint on canvas is Picasso most chosen way to work. The art work I will be focusing on is the weeping charwoman. It was made in 1907. Im not able to tell what surface the artwork is. I do not know the name of the sitter nor do I now that its actually a person who Picasso has Just made into his own idea or whether he pai nted this from his head.I chose this painting because I painted it in primary school and its his most known painting or the only painting I had ever heard of. The portrait is full length and the figure in the painting is in able to tell if she is sitting or standing as you can only see the top half of her body but Im presumptuous shes sitting. It is a close up and the head takes up most of the portrait so the head is definitely the biggest object in the painting. In the background it is Just simply a wall. The foreground and background do look Joined together because the woman isnt ad.You can see a bit of the sitter and a bit of the background. I can Just see a cartoon woman crying that is literally all I think if I was to imagine myself in the painting. I can hear a woman crying and smell lots of paint. You cant tell the time because it isnt a realistic painting. Im guessing something has happened as there is a woman in tears, it feels awkward and depressing , not a very clear pla ce to be. There is no lighting in the painting. I think the mood and atmosphere is sad and awkward. Its expression and the body language of the sitter also the painting itself is about a woman crying.I would describe the mood of the sitter as upset and you cant see the shoulders. You can see batch hands as if she was holding a tissue up to her face to wipe her nose/eyes. She is multicultural I cant see any of her clothes. I have no idea why Picasso chose this color scheme. The artists style is cartoonist and gazump to me. You cant see the brushstrokes. I dont think he worked on this painting as long as he did the others, he others Just look as if they have been thought through more carefully. The painting is flat, I dont know what textures have been used.